The Media Ignores Writing Style Guides

Major media outlets have long been guilty of  ignoring writing style guides, but recently the infractions have grown mythic.

BuzzFeed, ever the chaotic neutral, made skid marks on the lawn of illustrations by captioning a meme with “This is peak chaos,” thus summoning the silent wrath of the virality gods. The punishment was swift: a slideshow titled The Silence of Virality, narrated only by wind, now haunts the BuzzFeed homepage.

CNN, in a misguided attempt to explain metaphor without ritual, reduced “the economy is a rollercoaster” to bar graphs and bullet points. The cosmic penalty? All financial anchors must now wear cloaks and speak in riddles, their segments transformed into oracular murmurs.

The Guardian committed a font-based heresy, deploying Comic Sans in a climate article–a typographic affront so grave it triggered a séance with Marshall McLuhan, attended only by melting ice cubes and unread op-eds.

Meanwhile, The New Yorker embedded a sponsored link inside a haiku, monetizing line three with a mattress brand.

NPR, usually the paragon of restraint, cited @HotDogFan420 as a primary source during a segment on civic unrest. Their penance involves fact-checking every tweet using a divining rod and a bowl of lentils, a ritual both tedious and spiritually ambiguous.

The Washington Post, in a moment of lexical excess, used “unprecedented” three times in one paragraph to describe a Tuesday. They now owe the public a twelve-part series defining “precedented,” narrated by a sentient thesaurus named William.

BuzzFeed, again, published a listicle without numerals–”Things That Are Definitely Sandwiches”–forcing them to rank all sandwiches using planetary alignment and crust density.

Cosmopolitan, in a bold but misguided embrace of automation, let AI generate horoscopes without apology. Gemini was told to “embrace their algorithmic twin,” and now all astrological predictions must be vetted by a live goat named Oracle.

Fox News, not to be outdone, cited a PTA newsletter as breaking news: “Local mom bans glitter–nation reacts.” Their cosmic consequence involves hosting a glitter tribunal chaired by three retired librarians and a raccoon named Justice.

Finally, Vice published a thinkpiece without thinking: “Why Your Toaster Might Be Sexist.” The toaster has since been interviewed. It did not answer. These are not just editorial missteps. They are cosmic betrayals. And the consequences, though absurd, are entirely deserved.

For more red-hot dispatches from a culture in decline, click here and run for cover.