Terms and Conditions Updated to Include Everything People Agreed to Already
A coalition of major tech platforms called the Consortium for Seamless User Agreements (CSUA) confirmed in a press release that they have updated their terms and conditions. These now include several provisions users had already agreed to, whether they recall doing so or not. The changes, described as “codifications of prior understandings,” affect privacy, ownership, and the general definition of consent.
The CSUA press release describing the updated terms and conditions arrived via email, with a subject line that read, “We’ve Made Some Updates (Nothing You Need to Do).” The message reassured users that no action was required beyond continuing to exist online in roughly the same manner as before. A checkbox labeled “I Agree” remained available and fully operational for those needing reassurance.
“Users value transparency,” explained Dana Kessler, 43, senior vice president of retroactive consent, whose previous work includes standardizing the phrase “for your convenience” across seventeen separate platforms.
“We’ve worked hard to ensure that everything we’re doing now is something you’ve technically agreed to at some point, possibly in 2014.”
Among the newly codified provisions are agreements to future updates not yet written, consent to data uses not yet invented, and a clause stating that continued existence, whether active or passive, constitutes full acceptance. A footnote further explains that logging off may also be interpreted as agreement, “depending on context.”
People responded to the news with a noticeable lack of concern. One man in sweatpants scrolled half-heartedly, exhaled, and clicked “Agree” with the quiet resignation of someone renewing a gym membership. Another user reported searching unsuccessfully for a “Disagree but Continue” option before selecting the only available path forward.
“I used to read these,” said Melissa Grant, 51, a former privacy advocate who stopped trying in 2018. “Then they started updating the updates, and at some point it felt rude to pretend I was involved in the process.”
Legal analysts were quick to provide context. “What we’re seeing is an evolution of consent,” said Harold Wexler, 62, a contract law specialist who spoke for several minutes without arriving at a sentence that could be repeated with confidence.
“The language isn’t meant to be understood so much as acknowledged, which is itself a form of understanding, legally speaking.”
Platforms emphasized that the revised terms and conditions are always available for review. Estimated reading time remains “approximately eight minutes,” though internal studies can confirm no instance of anyone ever having completed them.
Want more digital blasphemy? Fill your boots at technology mayhem.
Find Us Elsewhere
Instagram
X (Twitter)